{"id":4142,"date":"2017-01-20T23:20:55","date_gmt":"2017-01-21T06:20:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stallioncornell.com\/blog\/?p=4142"},"modified":"2026-07-01T12:46:45","modified_gmt":"2026-07-01T18:46:45","slug":"now-thats-a-bad-speech","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stallioncornell.com\/blog\/now-thats-a-bad-speech\/","title":{"rendered":"Now THAT&#8217;S a bad speech"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This past summer, I was at a wedding reception talking to a guy who was terrified about the trade deficit.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Did you KNOW,&#8221; he said, speaking in capital letters, &#8220;that the TRADE DEFICIT last year was 700 BILLION DOLLARS?!!&#8221; (That&#8217;s him verbatim. You could absolutely hear the extra exclamation points after the question mark.)<\/p>\n<p>I told him I didn&#8217;t know &#8211; I still don&#8217;t, as that number sounds like it was a number pulled out of his butt &#8211; but even if that were true, I told him I couldn&#8217;t care less.<\/p>\n<p>He was aghast. &#8220;But WHERE\u00a0is AMERICA\u00a0going to come up with THAT\u00a0kind of money?!&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It was then I realized that the word &#8220;deficit&#8221; had convinced him that a &#8220;trade deficit&#8221; is exactly the same thing as a &#8220;budget deficit.&#8221; That&#8217;s about as stupid as someone who thinks salad dressing should only be stored in dressing rooms. The words are the same, yes, but the meaning is different enough that\u00a0no one really\u00a0needs to\u00a0worry about spilling\u00a0Thousand Island on their Hamlet tights.<\/p>\n<p>When the government has\u00a0a budget deficit, they\u00a0have a shortfall\u00a0between the amount of money they spend and the amount of money they take in. We buy, say, two or three trillion dollars worth of stuff, but we don&#8217;t\u00a0have enough cash\u00a0to cover that extra $500 billion or so. So we stick the rest on the credit card and hope that the bill arrives in the mail when the American people aren&#8217;t looking.<\/p>\n<p>A trade deficit, however, is the difference\u00a0between the amount of stuff we buy as opposed to the amount of stuff we sell. So if I sell you my old comic book collection for fifty bucks, you have just racked up a staggering $50 trade deficit with me. WHERE \u00a0are YOU going to come up with THAT kind of money?!<\/p>\n<p>As you can see, the question makes no sense at all.\u00a0You don&#8217;t owe me anything, since you were already stupid enough to blow fifty bucks on\u00a0a pile of rotting newsprint with pictures of Green Lantern drawn on them. \u00a0But you&#8217;re okay with it, too, because you decided that you wanted those dog-eared comics more than you wanted the fifty bucks. And thus, through the magic of capitalism, \u00a0both of us walked away happy.<\/p>\n<p>Last May, Donald Trump, ostensibly a savvy capitalist himself, proved that when it comes to this fundamental tenet\u00a0of economics, he doesn&#8217;t know salad dressing from comic books. Speaking to a rally of true believers, then-Candidate Trump mocked the people who were worried that his proposed tariffs and taxes would start a trade war.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Trade war?!&#8221; he sniffed, the extra exclamation point dripping from\u00a0his scowling\u00a0smirk. &#8220;We\u2019re losing $500 billion in trade with China. Who the hell cares if there\u2019s a trade war?!\u201d<\/p>\n<p>(Wait, it&#8217;s $500 BILLION, not $700 BILLION?!!\u00a0\u00a0Why didn&#8217;t TRUMP\u00a0tell the GUY at the WEDDING RECEPTION ?!)<\/p>\n<p>Kindly consider the depth of ignorance found in\u00a0Trump&#8217;s statement. We&#8217;re &#8220;losing&#8221; $500 billion in trade with China. So when we trade with China, we hand them $500 billion, and they hand us&#8230; nothing, apparently, because that money is lost. LOST! We&#8217;re losing it. So WHO\u00a0the HELL\u00a0cares?<\/p>\n<p>Of course, that money is not lost. We handed them half a trillion bucks; they handed us all kinds of crap &#8211; shoes and umbrellas and refrigerators and iPhones and Trump-brand neckties, all made in China. (Yes, before he inflicted himself on the American electorate, Trump was making America great again by exploiting cheap Chinese labor.) That $500 billion isn&#8217;t &#8220;lost.&#8221; It&#8217;s been traded. And it wouldn&#8217;t have been traded if we didn&#8217;t prefer having iPhones to having the money we paid for them. The trades were voluntary &#8211; both parties are satisfied. No bill for $500 billion is going to arrive in the White House mailbox unless Melania decides to surprise\u00a0Barron by buying Guam for him as a birthday present.<\/p>\n<p>All this is prelude to how terrible President Trump&#8217;s inaugural speech was. I&#8217;m not talking about its\u00a0moments of breathtaking stupidity, like his line about how kids are stuck in a school system which &#8220;leaves our young and beautiful students deprived of all knowledge.&#8221; Really? Deprived of ALL knowledge? Do they become zombies? Or game show hosts? Well, at least they&#8217;re young and beautiful. Maybe they could hook up with some creepy billionaire who likes to grab young and beautiful people by the&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>But I digress. (Although it&#8217;s hysterical that the word &#8220;all&#8221; before knowledge has been <a href=\"http:\/\/www.realclearpolitics.com\/video\/2017\/01\/20\/trump_inauguration_speech_the_carnage_stops_right_now_from_this_day_forward_it_will_only_be_america_first.html\">dropped from the official transcript.<\/a> Trust me; it was there. I&#8217;d suggest that you rewatch the thing if you don&#8217;t believe me, but I wouldn&#8217;t wish that on anyone.)<\/p>\n<p>Trump got most passionate as he was describing &#8220;American carnage&#8221; caused by the horrors of other countries &#8220;making our products.&#8221; Other countries making OUR products?! No more!\u00a0\u00a0It&#8217;s time to rebuild the &#8220;rusted-out factories scattered like tombstones across the landscape of our nation.&#8221; \u00a0It&#8217;s going to be &#8220;America First.&#8221; Two rules: &#8220;Buy American and Hire American.&#8221; And that, my friends, is how we&#8217;re going to make America great again.<\/p>\n<p>Or, at the very least, make America as great as North Korea.<\/p>\n<p>North Korea, you see, has a philosophy called &#8220;Juche!&#8221; It&#8217;s a word that roughly translates into &#8220;self-reliance,&#8221; but in practical terms, it means that North Korea follows two simple rules: Buy North Korean and Hire North Korean. International trade is considered a betrayal of the Hermit Kingdom&#8217;s revolutionary principles.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_4143\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-4143\" style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/stallioncornell.com\/blog\/2017\/01\/20\/now-thats-a-bad-speech\/propaganda-poster-north-korea\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-4143\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-4143\" src=\"https:\/\/stallioncornell.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/5171479416_abd2c8f262.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"367\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-4143\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">That text either translates as &#8220;Self-Reliance&#8221; or &#8220;Deprived of all knowledge.&#8221;<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>And the result? Widespread poverty, massive repression, and famines so bad that vast swaths of populace have had to survive by eating grass.<\/p>\n<p>Trade is good. It creates wealth. And, like it or not, we live in a global economy. Pretending we don&#8217;t won&#8217;t return us to the 1920s, when we didn&#8217;t.<\/p>\n<p>Back then, the now-rusted-out factories were rust-free and churning out Model Ts built by 100% American labor. But now Ford can churn out sedans and SUVs that are exponentially more sophisticated than the Model T, and they can do it with a tiny fraction of the labor force. Why? Automation. Those assembly line jobs have been made obsolete by technology, and, Trump&#8217;s populist, protectionist rhetoric aside,\u00a0they&#8217;re not coming back.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve said many times that the entirety of the MBA I earned can be summed up in three words &#8211; markets are efficient. If labor is going overseas, it&#8217;s because the market has\u00a0found a more efficient use of capital. If government jumps in and tries to stop it, it&#8217;s a bit like tearing up all the modern car-building machinery and forcing Toyota\u00a0to make all its Priuses by hand, complete with hordes of seamstresses sewing up the leather seats. Will that create jobs? Well, yes, but it will also destroy other jobs, destroy a great deal of wealth, and ultimately make Toyota so non-competitive that they&#8217;ll go out of business, thereby destroying the short-term Prius-leather-seat-sewing jobs that made Trump\u00a0look like a hero when he created them.<\/p>\n<p>This is the real danger of Trump, folks. He&#8217;s going to mandate that the economy operate like it did fifty years ago, and if he gets his way, we&#8217;ll ALL\u00a0be eating GRASS!!<\/p>\n<p>Hopefully, we&#8217;ll still have some SALAD DRESSING.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Thispast summer, I was at a wedding reception talking to a guy who was terrified about the trade deficit.\"Did you KNOW,\" he said, speaking in capital letters, \"that the TRADE DEFICIT last year was 700 BILLION DOLLARS?!!\" (That's him verbatim. You could absolutely hear the extra exclamation points after the question mark.)I told him I  ... <a title=\"Now THAT&#8217;S a bad speech\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/stallioncornell.com\/blog\/now-thats-a-bad-speech\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about Now THAT&#8217;S a bad speech\">Read more<\/a>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4142","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stallioncornell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4142","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stallioncornell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stallioncornell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stallioncornell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stallioncornell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4142"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/stallioncornell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4142\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5207,"href":"https:\/\/stallioncornell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4142\/revisions\/5207"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stallioncornell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4142"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stallioncornell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4142"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stallioncornell.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4142"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}