Agent Scooter XXX wrote:
One of my favorite cousins is g@y and both he and his partner would agree that you're a moron and to stick a cork in it.
Then why do you keep implying that I'm gay, as if that would somehow be a bad thing? And what about this statement:
Homophobic Bigot wrote:
If a conservative is homosexual, he quietly leads his life. If a liberal is homosexual, he demands legislated respect. viewtopic.php?f=4&t=10875&p=136774#p136774
You don't mind gays as long as they're "quiet?" Of course, straights can make all the noise they want.
rednecks like you,
I'm a typical New Jersey Italian that resides at the Jersey Shore for most of my life.
I was using it more to refer to the mindset, rather than the locality.
Do you even know what a redneck is you Liberal bigot?
I'm from the South, so sadly, yes.
who delude themselves into thinking that they're conservatives because they want to cut funding on welfare spending,
Once again you have no idea what you're talking about.
I'm an Independent and not a conservative.
Then why did you start that thread (linked above) entited "
Some differences between Conservatives and Liberals........."?
And yes I am against tax payers having to fund welfare checks to the unemployable, unskilled, lazy deadbeats of society.
What's wrong with that?
Not the point of the statement (although I will say the issues involved with welfare are much more complex than you make them out to be). Now, finish the sentence....
but are fine spending absurd amounts of money on the military,
Perhaps Libtards like yourself hates our troops and view them as barbaric nazis.... but I (along with the majority of Americans
) support the our troops
Not the issue. The issue is money. I'm fine with having an Army, but the one we have costs a fortune to maintain. Yet, through some bizarre reason, its the one aspect of the budget no one will touch, although its by far the most over-funded. We don't need to have troops scattered across the globe. They belong HERE where they can protect US. Not the rest of the world.
and on keeping non-violent drug offenders in prison,
Are you that retarded?????
No I don't believe in the criminalization of Marijuana and the users.
I didn't specify marijuana. I said "DRUG offender." All of them. Putting them in prison is a waste of money. We wait until they want to get off, and put them in voluntary rehab. That way there's less people we have to pay for, we're actually dealing with the ones who can be helped (you can't break an addiction if the person doesn't want to break it. Even the DARE program tell kids that. It's one of the few things they DON'T lie about). Plus, we don't funnel tons of money into organized crime, and cause drug wars, and...Yeah, point is, the "War on Drugs" is a giant black hole sucking up our money.
However, you are more retarded than I ever gave you credit for if you believe that cocaine, crack, heroin, oxys, crystal meth and their users are non violent
Certainly they can make people violent. And when people become violent, they are arrested. However, we don't arrest people for crimes they might commit in the future. More significantly, there's absolutely nothing we can do to even reduce the usage of these drugs. Anyone who says otherwise is either ill-informed, or lying. Thus, the War on Drugs is every bit as useless as Prohibition, and needs to be ended.
along with prositutes, and other groups who have moral codes that disagree with your own,
Just because you're a steady buyer for your local male prostitute,
Why do you specify male? Why does that matter? Could it be because you're a homophobe?
don't demonize the rest of the people in society that has a common sense of decency.
What does society's sense of decency have to do with what private citizens can and can't do in their own bedrooms?
Hookers are gross and they carry every STD in the book.
...and that's what regulation is for. In Nevada they're required to use condoms, and are tested regularly for STDs. To date, the transmission rate has been 0%. This is how prostitution should be handled everywhere.