Stallion Cornell's Moist Board

Oh, so moist.
It is currently Sat May 25, 2013 12:43 am

All times are UTC - 7 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 123 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 9  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:11 pm 
Offline
A Manly Man

Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 8:07 am
Posts: 2142
Location: BFG
WarMonger wrote:
Everyone else I've ever known in my my 20+ years of service would have a very difficult time doing so if they had your history.


Well, if they are anything like you, I'm not surprised.

But I'm comforted by the MANY servicemembers I've known knowing that's not the case.

There are a few, but distinctly the minority.

Even the ones who would be inclined to agree with your politics. They would never want to shut me down in a polite conversation over this stuff.

With you, such concepts is foreign. (polite, converse)

Which makes me sad.

Oh well.

_________________
He's BAAAACK...kimche rules, but soju is overrated.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:03 am
Posts: 89
tstone wrote:
WarMonger wrote:
Everyone else I've ever known in my my 20+ years of service would have a very difficult time doing so if they had your history.


Well, if they are anything like you, I'm not surprised.

But I'm comforted by the MANY servicemembers I've known knowing that's not the case.

There are a few, but distinctly the minority.

Even the ones who would be inclined to agree with your politics. They would never want to shut me down in a polite conversation over this stuff.

With you, such concepts is foreign. (polite, converse)

Which makes me sad.

Oh well.


Maybe you haven't proven yourself to be a traitor to them yet?

More likely, they aren't aware that you advertised yourself to the general public as a military member undermining the then commander-in-chief so you could get a little attention.


Just a thought.


The folks I've known have always had a dim view of traitors, regardless of their political feelings.

Its goes beyond politics.


Russell


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:20 pm 
Offline
A Manly Man

Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 8:07 am
Posts: 2142
Location: BFG
WarMonger wrote:

Maybe you haven't proven yourself to be a traitor to them yet?


According to you, just thinking how I do is "traitorous". It's more likely that you are just plain wrong.

Quote:
More likely, they aren't aware that you advertised yourself to the general public as a military member undermining the then commander-in-chief so you could get a little attention.


Uh, no, because I never opine in that capacity. Nowhere in the regs does it say that we are only allowed to express ourselves if we act like our military capacity is some kind of SECRET IDENTITY!

Idiot.

That was stupid, Rusty.


Quote:
The folks I've known have always had a dim view of traitors, regardless of their political feelings.


And braindead idealogues are quick to throw that word out, diminishing it's power in it's abuse/misuse.

Quote:
Its goes beyond politics.


Not in your case.

It's ALL politics. You just try to justify yourself by repeating to yourself and everyone else that it's not.

Watch.

You'll repeat it again.

_________________
He's BAAAACK...kimche rules, but soju is overrated.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:03 am
Posts: 89
Do you really want to fail a THIRD litmus test of your own devising?

Lets make this simple. I consider you a traitor. You proved it beyond any doubt. Your arguement that its about politics ignores the hundreds to thousands of other military members who had similar thoughts that I never once considered a traitor. In fact, only YOU are the traitor. Nobody else has gained that name for their actions in the military.

At least two military lawyers in Florida agree with me. One wanted to take action against you but I talked him out of it. He did have some colorful names for you though. By comparison, I'm being nice.

Your extremely poor ability to understand basic facts or relay them makes everything you say worthless. In fact, most of what you say derives from your inability to understand even the most simple facts. Having read your writings for a while, I consider you to be a person of extremely limited intelligence who has gotten a lot of miles out of trying to redefine an arguement by stating his wishes as some sort of fact. Almost every posting with me is proof of that. You make blanket statesments on things as if they somehow cause previous postings and facts to vanish. I have no doubt you really are stupid enough to believe that's true.

You bury a lot of these with postings of articles and excerpts of articles that in fact, have only a weak connection to the point you're trying to put forward. I've considered you a liar but I have to admit you may just be too stupid to understand the difference. At this point, I'm not sure if you're a liar or just a complete idiot but I am sure you're not worth the effort trying to find out.

In every arguement you've had since I've come on the board, you've gotten your ass kicked because you can't assemble actual facts into any real discussion. You rant and pretend about how you "blew that out of the water" but flame war rants do not change the glaring truth about you, which, as I said in the beginning, most everyone has clearly seen.

Many posts after our initial disagreements, the fact reamins that when your nation needed you, you spit in her face and pretended you were some sort of patriot for doing so.

You can say you didn't link your military position to your propaganda but members pulled up posts the previous time that clearly proved otherwise. Posts from other boards were worse. That fat lady sung months ago and no matter how much you want to argue about what the meaning of "is" is, it doesn't change that you are an embarassment to the uniform you wear. You can claim all you want that everyone who knows you would agree with you but I know the truth and I'm convinced that you're just barely smart enough to know the truth as well, which is why you fight so hard to pretend that things are differently than you and I know they really are.

I would go through and say "Hey, my friend, this is where you made mistakes in your ambition to show your hatred. I think you lost sight of what's truly important" but to do so would be for me to pretend that you have a basic worth that I don't feel you have and am certain never will feel you will ever have.

Its well known that I've dealt with the disposition of many al-Qaeda, Shi'a, and Columbian terrorists in my time and I've found almost all of them to be more respectable than I regard you.

That alone should pretty well illustrate that its not about politics.

You can keep pretending that I have some sort of blind hatred and angry ambition against everyone who disagrees with me politically. You can say it over and over. Like your missing the point with the Cheney quotes, you're missing the point with my statements as well. I've very, very clearly told you what I think about you and the reasons why. I don't see your point in trying to pretend that I'm somehow masking what is a very direct message. Disguise it all you want. You sound like a woman in the process but if you were acting like a woman, that at least is still better than every other action you've taken.

The fat lady sung months ago and in your case, there certainly are no do-overs.

Save your Internet sidesteps for the people gullable enough to buy your conscious man in uniform act.

I know better.


Russell


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:31 pm
Posts: 161
Ok, I'm confused. Is Bush a prophet from God or not? :?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:48 pm 
Offline
A Manly Man

Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 8:07 am
Posts: 2142
Location: BFG
WarMonger wrote:
Do you really want to fail a THIRD litmus test of your own devising?

Nobody else has gained that name for their actions in the military.


Your calling me a traitor repeatedly does not make me a traitor. To "gain" that from you would mean that would be up to you to bestow.

It isn't. Get over yourself.

There is no post with me representing myself in a military capacity and saying while representing the organization I work for or the service my opinions. And no one pulled up such a quote.

Reproduce one here, if it's so easy.

Otherwise, STFU, old man.

The end.

PS. Damn right, it's about politics. Not to mention LOTS and LOTS of hyperbole and drama queenery.

_________________
He's BAAAACK...kimche rules, but soju is overrated.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:03 am
Posts: 89
Since I can't resist letting you fail your own litmus test A THIRD TIME:

In a search that took 45 seconds of research, in the thread "Obama is going to win"

You quoted Loki who said "Hey, me too. Also, George W. Bush is his Commander in Chief. Which means he should not be dissing his Commander."

Your immediate reply was to attack Loki and seemingly everyone who disagreed with you politically while attacking George Bush AS THE COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF (since it was already identified in the thread).

There was another 5000+ postings with your name about Bush with a quick board search. However, I don't need to go any further to clearly show that even after you'd been identified as being in the military while he was commander-in-chief, you still kept attacking him, just as you've claimed in this thread, never happened.

Liar or idiot? I don't know and I don't really care.

From my memory, I recall your making posts about he is the worst commander-in-chief you've ever had and ranting about how he engaged in a false war on lies. I'm sure that's in the 5000+.

Suffice to say, 45 seconds of effort proves you wrong, again.

How does it feel to once again prove that the statements about you are absolutely true?


Russell


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:10 pm 
Offline
BANNED Official Moist Board Recruiter!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 9:39 pm
Posts: 2977
Location: 1313 Mockingbird Lane, Mockingbird Heights
Neuromanzr wrote:
Guy_Montag wrote:
Neuromanzr wrote:

The Angels of Gog and Magog are in fact Demons and I think Demons do poop...they poop all over the place...I won't argue over that...BUT the Angels that will descend from Heaven above to battle them...those Angels don't poop!


Let's see if I've got this straight. You say Angels don't poop, but Demons, who are merely Fallen Angels, do poop. So God decided that if you're no longer an Angel, if you've rebelled, and you're Fallen, that now you have to poop?

I disagree. RDM's brilliance was to specifically show the world that 200k years ago Angels do poop, whether they are Fallen or not. It took him six years of hard work to reveal this revelation. What a genius!


Look here Mr Montag, you obviously have a short memory, this issue of the pooping fallen angels has already been adressed:

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=9193&start=27

...deal with it.


Th Issue of RDM Pooping Angels has been addressed. Your theory does not hold water. It is incorrect. Sorry.

_________________
ImageI'm the Duke of New York, I'm A Number One!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:14 pm 
Offline
BANNED Official Moist Board Recruiter!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 9:39 pm
Posts: 2977
Location: 1313 Mockingbird Lane, Mockingbird Heights
BSGLapDog wrote:
Ok, I'm confused. Is Bush a prophet from God or not? :?


Maybe. Possibly. Perhaps. I don't believe there's anyway to verify this hypothesis using the Scientific Method. So, it will probably remain another Mystery of the Cosmos, like Sasquatch.

_________________
ImageI'm the Duke of New York, I'm A Number One!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:31 pm
Posts: 161
Since no one else respects the intent of this thread I guess I won't either. . .

People are afforded a certain amount of anonymity on this board. TStone has availed himself of that anonymity. WarMonger, if your lawyer friend had to be "talked out of" pursuing TStone, who, precisely, would he have gone after had you not "talked him out of it"? Maybe TStone outed himself and everyone knows his real-world identity (I'm pretty new here so I wouldn't know), but if he hasn't it is just his willingness to admit to having served that you're (WarMonger) using to condemn him of UCMJ violations -- you have no proof to who he actually is.

In otherwords, because we don't know his identity, you are condemning anonymous words, not a man. I routinely have anonymous words (insofar as others are concerned) spoken inside my head -- inner dialogue. Forgive me, but I suspect that even the great WarMonger, during his twenty years of honorable service to his country, has thought at one time or another, "WTF is (name a president) doing that? What a dumbass!" And anyone who has been in the service knows for a fact you thought that about a higher ranking officer/NCO (whoever was higher than you).

Without turning the Moist board, and every other blog that offers anonymity, into an SS snitch, how, precisely, would your lawyer friend have gone about pursuing a case against TStone? Or is a little Nazi Germany really what you're looking for?

_________________
Image


Last edited by BSGLapDog on Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:43 pm 
Offline
Overcompensating homophobe, Neuro obsessed Spiderr fan with anger management issues
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 6:57 pm
Posts: 1880
Location: My house.
Guy_Montag wrote:
BSGLapDog wrote:
Ok, I'm confused. Is Bush a prophet from God or not? :?


Maybe. Possibly. Perhaps. I don't believe there's anyway to verify this hypothesis using the Scientific Method. So, it will probably remain another Mystery of the Cosmos, like Sasquatch.

Sasquatch isn't a mystery.
I keep trying to keep him in the back yard. I even feed him good (he's costing me a fortune!).
But dammit, he just has to keep wandering off and scaring people.
He's perfectly harmless, except when you have to clean up after him... if you know what I mean. :roll:

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:31 pm
Posts: 161
Benny wrote:
Guy_Montag wrote:
BSGLapDog wrote:
Ok, I'm confused. Is Bush a prophet from God or not? :?


Maybe. Possibly. Perhaps. I don't believe there's anyway to verify this hypothesis using the Scientific Method. So, it will probably remain another Mystery of the Cosmos, like Sasquatch.

Sasquatch isn't a mystery.
I keep trying to keep him in the back yard. I even feed him good (he's costing me a fortune!).
But dammit, he just has to keep wandering off and scaring people.
He's perfectly harmless, except when you have to clean up after him... if you know what I mean. :roll:

I keep mine in Depends. :wink: You should try them.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:46 pm 
Offline
Overcompensating homophobe, Neuro obsessed Spiderr fan with anger management issues
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 6:57 pm
Posts: 1880
Location: My house.
BSGLapDog wrote:
Benny wrote:
Sasquatch isn't a mystery.
I keep trying to keep him in the back yard. I even feed him good (he's costing me a fortune!).
But dammit, he just has to keep wandering off and scaring people.
He's perfectly harmless, except when you have to clean up after him... if you know what I mean. :roll:

I keep mine in Depends. :wink: You should try them.

You're Sasquatch must be smaller than mine. :?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:31 pm
Posts: 161
Benny wrote:
BSGLapDog wrote:
Benny wrote:
Sasquatch isn't a mystery.
I keep trying to keep him in the back yard. I even feed him good (he's costing me a fortune!).
But dammit, he just has to keep wandering off and scaring people.
He's perfectly harmless, except when you have to clean up after him... if you know what I mean. :roll:

I keep mine in Depends. :wink: You should try them.

You're Sasquatch must be smaller than mine. :?

There's just nothing like your sasquatch in Depends. It's a whole new kind of freedom.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:54 pm 
Offline
Overcompensating homophobe, Neuro obsessed Spiderr fan with anger management issues
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 6:57 pm
Posts: 1880
Location: My house.
BSGLapDog wrote:
There's just nothing like your sasquatch in Depends. It's a whole new kind of freedom.

I named mine's Ralph because when he gets cranky he acts like Jackie Gleason.
What about your's?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 123 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 9  Next

All times are UTC - 7 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group