I was really really wanting to avoid this thread because of my past as a preacher and I didn't want to drag that out again on this board that is supposed to be a "fun" place, but seriously Darth, if the said article in question is what Bush really believes, then his theology is all wrong.
"And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them."
Bush believed the time had now come for that battle, telling Chirac:
"This confrontation is willed by God, who wants to use this conflict to erase his people's enemies before a New Age begins".
The battle mentioned here does not take place until (if you choose to believe the Bible, which is up to you to decide) 1000 years after Christ returns. This battle is not Armegeddon. Armegeddon is the battle that will take place just before Christ returns, in fact Christ returns by stepping in the middle of it. If he didn't, mankind would end up obliterating himself off of the planet once and for all.
Granted, in the Bible there were King's who felt called by God to lead wars, but unlike Bush, those Kings went out into the battle with the men they sent out to fight.
If Bush was truly using this as a basis for going to war, then I would have to question his sanity. He based it on an erroneous interpretation of scripture, and that breeds the most dangerous minds.