Stallion Cornell's Moist Board

Oh, so moist.
It is currently Thu May 23, 2013 10:36 am

All times are UTC - 7 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 5:38 am 
Offline
Blanned Phantom Clone-Master
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 9:00 pm
Posts: 1910
http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=16878

Congress enacted the tax rebate program earlier this year because it perceived a growing risk of recession. Supporters reasoned that the program would boost consumer confidence as well as available cash. They hoped the combination would cause households to spend a substantial fraction of the rebate dollars, leading to more production and employment, according to Martin Feldstein, a professor at Harvard University.

The evidence is now in:

* Recent government statistics show that only between 10 percent and 20 percent of the rebate dollars were spent.
* The rebates added nearly $80 billion to the permanent national debt but less than $20 billion to consumer spending.

This experience confirms earlier studies showing that one-time tax rebates are not a cost-effective way to increase economic activity, says Feldstein.

These conclusions are significant for evaluating the likely impact of Barack Obama's recent proposal to distribute $1,000 rebate checks to low- and middle-income workers at an estimated cost of approximately $65 billion. His plan, to finance those rebates with an extra tax on oil companies, would reduce investment in refining and exploration, keeping oil prices higher than they would otherwise be, says Feldstein.

Here are the facts:

* Tax rebates of $78 billion arrived in the second quarter of the year.
* The government's recent gross domestic product (GDP) figures show that the level of consumer outlays only rose by an extra $12 billion, or 15percent of the lost revenue.
* The rest went into savings, including the paydown of debt.

All of the evidence on one-time tax rebates implies that the Obama plan to send $1,000 rebate checks would do little to raise consumer spending and stop the decline in employment. If the past is an indicator of what would happen, the $65 billion he proposes to spend on this plan would raise consumer spending by only about $10 billion, or less than one-tenth of 1 percent of GDP, says Feldstein.

Source: Martin Feldstein, "The Tax Rebate Was a Flop. Obama's Stimulus Plan Won't Work Either." Wall Street Journal, August 6, 2008.

For text:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121798022246515105.html

For more on Economic Issues:

http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?A ... ategory=17

_________________
http://www.cosmic-outpost.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 5:39 am 
Offline
Blanned Phantom Clone-Master
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 9:00 pm
Posts: 1910
Cue the Specialist now to chime in and bullshit about how everyone's lying about Obama.

_________________
http://www.cosmic-outpost.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:24 am 
Offline
Blanned Phantom Clone-Master
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 9:00 pm
Posts: 1910
Bump.

_________________
http://www.cosmic-outpost.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 7 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group